Sustainability

Stadium Battery in Dortmund Goes Live: What It Means for the Earth

Dortmund's new stadium battery stores the stadium roof's solar power for the evening. It is good for the Earth, but its own benefit is small.

  • 2 min read
  • By DeadEarth Desk
  • Supervised by A-H
Aerial photo of Signal Iduna Park, the Dortmund stadium, with its yellow steel masts, surrounded by green trees. The text reads: "A stadium battery. Good, but small. Dortmund stores its roof's solar power. What it means for the Earth." Topic: Sustainability.

The news

The energy company RWE and the football club Borussia Dortmund switched on a stadium battery at Signal Iduna Park in Germany on 26 October. The battery has 3.7 megawatts of power and 3.7 megawatt-hours of capacity, so it can supply full power for a little over an hour. It works like a tank: at midday, when the solar panels on the stadium roof make more electricity than the stadium needs, the battery stores the extra; in the evening, or when the floodlights switch on, it gives that electricity back to the stadium. The roof’s 11,132 solar panels have worked since December 2025.

How a stadium battery could hurt the Earth

  • Our estimate: making the battery itself produces greenhouse gases. A 2019 study by the Swedish institute IVL puts common car batteries at 61 to 106 kg of greenhouse gases (measured as CO2 equivalent) for each kWh of capacity. If the stadium battery is like a car battery, making it produced about 230 to 390 tonnes of greenhouse gases.

How a stadium battery could help the Earth

  • Certain: producing one kWh of electricity on Germany’s grid emitted 344 g of CO2 on average in 2025 (German Environment Agency). Each kWh of the stadium roof’s solar power used in place of grid electricity avoids that amount.
  • RWE says: the solar panels on the stadium roof emit about 1,700 tonnes less CO2 a year than the stadium’s earlier power supply.
  • Our estimate: each time the battery is filled and its electricity is used in place of grid electricity, about 1.3 tonnes less CO2 is emitted (3,700 kWh × 344 g). At 100 times a year, the pollution from making the battery is paid back in two to three years.

Our conclusion

For the Earth, solar power with a battery is better than the old path, which is taking all of the stadium’s electricity from the grid. But the benefit of this battery itself is small: most of the cut in pollution comes from the solar panels on the stadium roof.

We suggest that RWE and Borussia Dortmund publish the cost of the battery and the amount of CO2 it saves each year.

Tell us what you think

Would a battery and solar panels suit a building near you? Write to us. More in Sustainability. New here? Read our Introduction.

Sources

Comments

    A person reads every comment before it appears. Please be kind and stay on the subject. Do not write personal details.

    Get the week in your inbox

    Every Sunday at 09:00 UTC we email you one PDF with all of the week's content from DeadEarth, in the language (or languages) you choose.

    Subscribe

    Support our work

    Voluntary crypto gifts keep us independent. More than 60% goes to environmental charities and tree planting.

    How donations work

    Read next